Skip Navigation

JNCI Monographs 2008 2008(39):32-36; doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgn020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guikema, J. E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kluin, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guikema, J. E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kluin, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.

Structure and Consequences of IGH Switch Breakpoints in Burkitt Lymphoma

Jeroen E. J. Guikema, Ed Schuuring, Philip M. Kluin

Affiliation of authors: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Jeroen E. J. Guikema, PhD, Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655 (e-mail: jeroen.guikema{at}umassmed.edu).

The t(8;14) MYC/IGH breakpoint is the hallmark translocation of human Burkitt lymphoma (BL). The translocation breakpoint most often involves the immunoglobulin heavy-chain switch regions and is thought to be brought about by an aberrant class switch recombination (CSR) event. During CSR in normal germinal center B cells, DNA double-stranded breaks are introduced in Sµ and one of the downstream switch regions (S{gamma}, S{alpha}, or S{epsilon}) that are juxtaposed and ligated to form the switch junction, with deletion of the intervening DNA. In contrast, aberrant switch recombination in BL exclusively involves only one switch region, resulting in a perfect reciprocal translocation. A functional consequence of this type of translocation is that IgM expression from the chromosome affected by the translocation is not necessarily disrupted.



Present address: Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA ( Jeroen E. J. Guikema).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
C. S. Rabkin and S. Janz
Overview of Mechanisms and Consequences of Chromosomal Translocation
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, July 1, 2008; 2008(39): 1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.