Skip Navigation

JNCI Monographs 2007 2007(37):22-26; doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgm008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrans, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrans, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press.

Differences in What Quality-of-Life Instruments Measure

Carol Estwing Ferrans

Affiliations of author: College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

Correspondence to: Carol Estwing Ferrans, PhD, RN, FAAN, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 South Damen Ave (MC 802), Chicago, IL 60612 (e-mail: cferrans{at}uic.edu).

To address the question of what value is added by assessing quality of life (QOL) in symptom management trials in cancer, we used the model of Wilson and Cleary to identify what is measured by the most commonly used QOL instruments. Examples of clinical trials are presented demonstrating the contributions of these broad-based QOL instruments in terms of symptoms, functioning, general health perceptions, and overall QOL. The examples show that QOL instruments can provide valuable information about side effects and impact on other aspects of life, which would not be captured by a more narrowly focused measure of the target symptom. A better understanding is needed of the differences in what QOL instruments measure, since conclusions regarding the effectiveness of treatment may differ depending on which one is used to assess outcomes. Head-to-head comparisons of instruments within the same studies would increase precision for selecting QOL instruments for symptom management trials.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
P. A. Ganz and P. J. Goodwin
Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Symptom Management Trials
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2007; 2007(37): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.