Skip Navigation

JNCI Monographs 2006 2006(36):96-105; doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Chapter 13: A Comparative Review of CISNET Breast Models Used To Analyze U.S. Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Trends

Lauren D. Clarke, Sylvia K. Plevritis, Rob Boer, Kathleen A. Cronin, Eric J. Feuer

Affiliations of authors: Cornerstone Systems, Lynden, WA (LDC); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (SKP); Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (RB); Statistical Research and Application Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (KAC, EJF)

Correspondence to: Lauren D. Clarke, MS, Cornerstone Systems Northwest Inc., 8665 Berthusen Rd., Lynden, WA 98264 (e-mail: lauren{at}cornerstonenw.com).

The CISNET Breast Cancer program is a National Cancer Institute–sponsored collaboration composed of seven research groups that have modeled the impact of screening and adjuvant treatment on trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality over the period 1975–2000 (base case). This collaboration created a unique opportunity to make direct comparison of results from different models of population-based cancer screening produced in response to the same question. Comparing results in all but the most cursory way necessitates comparison of the models themselves. Previous chapters have discussed the models individual in detail. This chapter will aid the reader in understanding key areas of difference between the models. A focused analysis of differences and similarities between the models is presented with special attention paid to areas deemed most likely to contribute substantially to the results of the target analysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. S. Mandelblatt, K. A. Cronin, S. Bailey, D. A. Berry, H. J. de Koning, G. Draisma, H. Huang, S. J. Lee, M. Munsell, S. K. Plevritis, et al.
Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms
Ann Intern Med, November 17, 2009; 151(10): 738 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
E. J. Feuer
Chapter 1: Modeling the Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Screening Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality Between 1975 and 2000: Introduction to the Problem
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 2 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. D. F. Habbema, S. Y. G. L. Tan, and K. A. Cronin
Chapter 14: Impact of Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality, 1975-2000: Are Intermediate Outcome Measures Informative?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
K. A. Cronin, E. J. Feuer, L. D. Clarke, and S. K. Plevritis
Chapter 15: Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Mammography on U.S. Mortality From 1975 to 2000: Comparison of Mortality Results From the CISNET Breast Cancer Base Case Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 112 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. D. F. Habbema, C. B. Schechter, K. A. Cronin, L. D. Clarke, and E. J. Feuer
Chapter 16: Modeling Cancer Natural History, Epidemiology, and Control: Reflections on the CISNET Breast Group Experience
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 122 - 126.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.