Skip Navigation

JNCI Monographs 2006 2006(36):19-25; doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holford, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holford, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Feuer, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Chapter 4: Changing Patterns in Breast Cancer Incidence Trends

Theodore R. Holford, Kathleen A. Cronin, Angela B. Mariotto, Eric J. Feuer

Affiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (TRH); Statistical Research and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (KAC, ABM, EJF)

Correspondence to: Theodore R. Holford, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208034, 60 College St., New Haven, CT 06520-8034 (e-mail: theodore.holford{at}yale.edu).

Incidence rates for breast cancer in U.S. women have steadily increased for decades, but the reasons are not well understood. A recent upturn in these trends suggests that one component may be the effect of more aggressive screening in the population. The age–period–cohort framework, in which the temporal components associated with year of diagnosis and generation are evaluated, can assist in interpreting the elements associated with these trends. A unique approach for exploring other ways of partitioning the contribution of the different temporal components is described and applied to breast cancer incidence data (ICDO 174.0–174.9) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries. Single-year intervals for age and year of diagnosis were used to fit models that provide estimates of the trends associated with the individual temporal elements. A log-linear model for age, period, and cohort was fitted using Poisson regression, and estimates of the separate time trends were calculated. The trends with period increased after 1982, when more aggressive screening began, and the trend is steeper for women older than 40 years. Cohort trends have increased steadily, although recent cohorts appear to be somewhat flat for women aged 50 years or younger, whereas the trend for those older than 50 years have continued to increase. Estimates of cohort trends in rates are also provided by extrapolating what would have occurred had there been no period trend before or after 1982, thus providing an estimate of the magnitude of the upturn that occurred after the recent emphasis on screening.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N. Krieger
Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of US breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 627 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. N.A. Tosteson, N. K. Stout, D. G. Fryback, S. Acharyya, B. A. Herman, L. G. Hannah, E. D. Pisano, and for the DMIST Investigators
Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Mammography Breast Cancer Screening
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 2008; 148(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. F. Anderson, A. S. Reiner, R. K. Matsuno, and R. M. Pfeiffer
Shifting Breast Cancer Trends in the United States
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3923 - 3929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
E. J. Feuer
Chapter 1: Modeling the Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Screening Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality Between 1975 and 2000: Introduction to the Problem
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 2 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
D. A. Berry, L. Inoue, Y. Shen, J. Venier, D. Cohen, M. Bondy, R. Theriault, and M. F. Munsell
Chapter 6: Modeling the Impact of Treatment and Screening on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality: A Bayesian Approach
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 30 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
D. G. Fryback, N. K. Stout, M. A. Rosenberg, A. Trentham-Dietz, V. Kuruchittham, and P. L. Remington
Chapter 7: The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 37 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. Mandelblatt, C. B. Schechter, W. Lawrence, B. Yi, and J. Cullen
Chapter 8: The SPECTRUM Population Model of the Impact of Screening and Treatment on U.S. Breast Cancer Trends From 1975 to 2000: Principles and Practice of the Model Methods
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 47 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
S. Y. G. L. Tan, G. J. van Oortmarssen, H. J. de Koning, R. Boer, and J. D. F. Habbema
Chapter 9: The MISCAN-Fadia Continuous Tumor Growth Model for Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 56 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
S. Lee and M. Zelen
Chapter 11: A Stochastic Model for Predicting the Mortality of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
S. K. Plevritis, B. M. Sigal, P. Salzman, J. Rosenberg, and P. Glynn
Chapter 12: A Stochastic Simulation Model of U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality Trends From 1975 to 2000
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 86 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
L. D. Clarke, S. K. Plevritis, R. Boer, K. A. Cronin, and E. J. Feuer
Chapter 13: A Comparative Review of CISNET Breast Models Used To Analyze U.S. Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Trends
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 96 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. D. F. Habbema, S. Y. G. L. Tan, and K. A. Cronin
Chapter 14: Impact of Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality, 1975-2000: Are Intermediate Outcome Measures Informative?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
K. A. Cronin, E. J. Feuer, L. D. Clarke, and S. K. Plevritis
Chapter 15: Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Mammography on U.S. Mortality From 1975 to 2000: Comparison of Mortality Results From the CISNET Breast Cancer Base Case Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 112 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. D. F. Habbema, C. B. Schechter, K. A. Cronin, L. D. Clarke, and E. J. Feuer
Chapter 16: Modeling Cancer Natural History, Epidemiology, and Control: Reflections on the CISNET Breast Group Experience
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 122 - 126.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
K. A. Cronin, A. B. Mariotto, L. D. Clarke, and E. J. Feuer
Chapter 5: Additional Common Inputs for Analyzing Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Mammography on U.S. Mortality
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 26 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.