© 2001 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, No. 30, 52-55,
2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Factors Used to Select Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer in the United States: an Overview of Age, Race, and Socioeconomic Status
Correspondence to: Hyman B. Muss, M.D., University of Vermont College of Medicine, Vermont Cancer Center, University Health Center, St. Joseph 3400, 1 South Prospect St., Burlington, VT 05401 (e-mail: hyman.muss{at}vtmednet.org).
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TopNotes Abstract IntroductionRace and Socioeconomic Status...Age as a Factor...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Age, race, and socioeconomic status all play a role in decisions regarding breast cancer adjuvant therapy. Increasing age remains the major risk factor for breast cancer, while in very young women breast cancer may have a poorer prognosis, even when adjusted for disease stage and other variables. More than half of all new breast cancers in the United States occur in women older than 65 years. Because of the higher frequency of coexisting (comorbid) serious illness in older women, the benefits of adjuvant therapy get smaller as age increases. Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen and/or chemotherapy can statistically significantly improve survival in older women, but older women are less likely to receive chemotherapy and are less likely to be offered participation in clinical trials. Efforts are now under way to overcome age bias among health care providers and to develop clinical trials focusing on older patients. Breast cancer mortality is higher in African-Americans than in white Americans. Although the biologic characteristics of breast cancer are worse in African-Americans, major differences in survival are related to socioeconomic factors and access to care. When matched for disease stage and other major clinical and biologic variables, African-American and white patients have similar survival rates. Few data are available on the effects of adjuvant treatment on early breast cancer outcomes in Hispanic Americans and Asian-Americans. Poverty and lack of insurance are surrogates for poor outcomes; major efforts are needed to guarantee all Americans high-quality cancer care.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopNotesAbstractIntroductionRace and Socioeconomic Status...Age as a Factor...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Age, race, and socioeconomic status all affect decisions regarding breast cancer adjuvant therapy. More than half of all new breast cancers in the United States occur in women 65 years old or older, a statistic that has even more impact in a population whose longevity is increasing (1). Since coexisting illness (comorbidity) statistically significantly increases with age, it is a major factor in determining the relative benefit of adjuvant therapy on patient survival (2). In younger women, especially those less than 35 years old, breast cancer may have a poorer prognosis, even when adjusted for disease stage and other variables (3,4). African-Americans now constitute 12.7% of the U.S. population and have higher breast cancer mortality compared with Caucasian Americans, even after adjustment for disease stage (5). Such differences are related to several factors, including stage at presentation, tumor biology, and sociodemographic characteristics (5). Few data are available concerning breast cancer outcomes in Hispanic Americans who constitute 8.2% of the population, Asian-Americans who constitute 1.6% of the population, and Native Americans who constitute almost 1% of the population. In one study of 163 African-American, 205 Hispanic, and 964 Caucasian women, lower socioeconomic status was the major factor related to the poorer survival rates of Hispanic and African-American women compared with Caucasian women (6).
|
RACE AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AS A FACTOR IN ADJUVANT THERAPY OF BREAST CANCER |
|---|
|
TopNotesAbstractIntroductionRace and Socioeconomic Status...Age as a Factor...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Several trials have shown small but potentially important biologic differences in breast cancer among African-American and Caucasian patients. African-American patients are more likely than Caucasians to have more biologically aggressive tumors, including larger tumor size, an increased likelihood of involved lymph nodes, lack of hormone receptors, and a higher rate of tumor proliferation (Table 1
) (7). Hispanic Americans had tumor characteristics somewhat worse than Caucasians but better than African-Americans in this series. These adverse biologic tumor characteristics may limit the potential life-prolonging benefits of tamoxifen therapy or ovarian ablation in African-American and Hispanic patients compared with Caucasians. In large numbers of patients, these small differences in tumor biology may prove to be highly meaningful.
|
African-Americans and Hispanics do appear to be adequately represented in clinical trials (8). Limited data suggest that, at least for African-Americans, the benefits of adjuvant therapy are similar to those for Caucasian women when outcomes are adjusted for disease stage, comorbid illness, and pathologic and sociodemographic variables (9,10); however, most studies have not had the power to adequately test whether specific treatments have different survival and response rates in minority populations compared with the study group as a whole. Few data are available on Hispanic patients and other minorities concerning the risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy. The data also suggest that for Hispanics, like African-Americans, socioeconomic factors play a key role in outcome (6).
Poverty is associated with poorer cancer outcomes for all Americans, irrespective of racial or ethnic group, and remains a national issue (11). In one sobering study of 4675 women aged 35–64 years with breast cancer entered in the New Jersey State Tumor Registry, the adjusted risk of death was 49% higher for uninsured patients and 40% higher for Medicaid patients than for privately insured patients during the 54–89 months after diagnosis, even after adjustment for age, race, household income, coexisting illness, and disease stage (12). These numbers are of major concern, since 40–50 million Americans are currently underinsured or uninsured during a time of unprecedented economic growth. Providing access to high-quality health care for poorer and uninsured Americans remains a major national dilemma. Major efforts by the U.S. National Cancer Institute and other organizations to improve access of minorities to clinical trials are under way.
These data suggest that, at least for African-Americans, access to high-quality adjuvant treatment leads to similar outcomes compared with Caucasian patients, provided the patients are given similar treatments and have similar tumor biologic characteristics. However, differences in tumor biologic characteristics among African-Americans and Caucasian indicate that, even if care and access were equal, the unfavorable tumor characteristics more often seen in African-American patients would still result in a higher overall mortality for this group. Further research concerning the underlying molecular events leading to these differences in breast tumor biology is needed.
|
AGE AS A FACTOR IN ADJUVANT THERAPY OF BREAST CANCER |
|---|
|
TopNotesAbstractIntroductionRace and Socioeconomic Status...Age as a Factor...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Breast cancer incidence increases dramatically with age. In the United States, the incidence of breast cancer increases from less than 100 per 100 000 women in women less than 45 years old to a risk exceeding 300 per 100 000 women in women 75 years old or older (Fig. 1
) (13). Mortality data follow a similar pattern, with the majority of breast cancer deaths occurring in women 60 years old or older. Similar statistics are found in other industrialized countries. Since the populations of the United States and other industrialized nations continue to age, breast cancer is likely to be a more prevalent and common disease in the future (14) Goldhirsch et al. (4) in this monograph have presented compelling data that, for very young women, breast cancer carries a poorer prognosis even after adjustment for disease stage and other clinically important prognostic factors. Such data suggest that clinical trials in these young patients should explore more aggressive and, hopefully, more beneficial therapies than current standard treatments.
|
Breast cancer biology changes with age, and older patients have more favorable tumor characteristics. Diab et al. (15) compared the tumor and biologic characteristics of breast cancer patients among age groups (Table 2
). These more favorable tumor characteristics may translate into improved survival; for lymph node-negative patients in this series, survival was similar among breast cancer patients 70 years old or older and age-matched women from the general population. Nevertheless, several trials have shown that older women are less likely to receive appropriate local therapy, such as postoperative local radiation, or adjuvant systemic therapy compared with younger women (16). In healthier older women with higher risk lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive breast cancer, however, such undertreatment may lead to poorer outcomes.
|
Compelling data from a worldwide meta-analysis of adjuvant therapy (17) showed that, for older patients with estrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, tamoxifen statistically significantly increased both relapse-free and overall survival. Women 70 years old or older who took tamoxifen for 5 years had a 54% decrease in the annual odds of breast cancer recurrence and a 34% decrease in the annual odds of dying of breast cancer. Chemotherapy alone has not been studied adequately in older patients; in the same overview, fewer than 700 women 70 years old or older were entered in randomized trials. Chemotherapy, however, was associated with statistically significant improvements in both relapse-free and overall survival in women aged 50–69 years (a 20.3% and 11.3 % reduction in annual odds of relapse and death, respectively) (18). It is reasonable to expect that chemotherapy would have a similar effect in women 70 years old or older, but more data on chemotherapy trials are needed in older women.
The effects of major coexisting illness on survival are a crucial factor in assessing the potential benefits of chemotherapy in older patients. The potential benefits of adjuvant therapy in older women have been estimated recently with the use of a mathematical model (19); it is clear that the value of adjuvant therapy diminishes substantially as age and comorbidity increase and as non-breast cancer-related illness becomes a major competing cause for death. What is also clear is that older women in good general health tolerate standard chemotherapy regimens almost as well as younger women (20,21). Outside a trial, recommendations for adjuvant therapy made by an international consensus panel appear prudent and should be used as a treatment guideline (Table 3) (22).
|
Comorbidity is frequently a key issue in the decision to use adjuvant systemic therapy in the elderly. As comorbidity increases, the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy decrease, since the risk of dying of other non-breast cancer-related causes becomes more likely. In one study, women with three or more comorbid illnesses had a 20-fold higher risk of dying of non-breast cancer-related causes than women with no comorbid conditions, even after adjustment for disease stage, type of treatment, race, and social and behavioral factors (23). Several investigators (2,19,24) have developed models to predict the likely benefit of age or comorbidity on treatment outcome in older women with early-stage breast cancer. These models clearly show that the benefits of adjuvant therapy decrease with increasing age or comorbidity. Welch et al. (25) also provided data derived from a Markov model that predicted the effect of comorbidity on life expectancy (Fig. 2
). Even with potentially curative treatment, the effect of such treatment on overall life expectancy would be small for very old patients.
|
It is clear that older patients are underrepresented in clinical trials (8,26). Hutchins et al. (8) analyzed data from 16 396 patients consecutively enrolled in 164 Southwest Oncology Group treatment trials during the period from 1993 to 1996. Only 9% of the patients entered in breast cancer clinical trials were 65 years old or older compared with population and census estimates that indicated 49% of women with breast cancer during this time period were 65 years or older (8). Barriers to the participation of older women in clinical trials have been well defined by Trimble et al. (26) and include the following: 1) a research focus on aggressive therapy, which may be unacceptably toxic to the elderly; 2) the presence of comorbidity; 3) fewer trials specifically aimed at older patients; 4) limited expectations for long-term benefits on the part of physicians, relatives, and the patients themselves; and 5) a lack of financial, logistic, and social support for the participation of elderly patients in clinical trials (26). Issues related to reimbursement may be partially overcome by the recent Presidential mandate to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services to reimburse the costs of routine care for patients entered in appropriately reviewed clinical trials. Moreover, a recent study from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (27) compared participation in clinical trials among patients with stage I, II, or IV breast cancer who were less than 65 years with that among patients who were 65 years old or older who were treated by the same physician and who were eligible for a clinical trial within their institution. Of 77 pairs of patients matched on the basis of disease stage and treating physician, 34% of those 65 years old or older were offered trial participation compared with 51% younger than 65 years (P<.05). When participation in a trial was offered, however, similar rates of acceptance were found in the older and younger women (50% and 56% for older and younger women, respectively). Even after adjustment for other covariates, including race, comorbidity, educational level, marital status, and satisfaction with care, age alone predicted for a lower likelihood of being offered a clinical trial. Efforts are now under way to overcome these barriers and include National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Aging funding for clinical trials directed at older women (Table 4
) (28).
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
TopNotesAbstractIntroductionRace and Socioeconomic Status...Age as a Factor...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Racial, ethnic, and aging issues play a major role in appropriate delivery of adjuvant therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer. Although there are differences in tumor biology related to age and race, the major issue related to adjuvant therapy is access to care. For African-American and other ethnic and racial groups, socioeconomic factors are far more important than biologic factors in determining outcome. Lower incomes, limited or absent insurance coverage, and poorer education all translate into less access to initial quality treatment and later on to poorer survival.
Efforts are needed to provide all Americans with access to quality medical care. The survival benefits of systemic adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer are undisputed, and these treatments should be available to all Americans. Research is needed to determine the molecular mechanisms that underlie the differences in tumor biology among diverse racial and ethnic groups. For older Americans, research is needed on the interactions of adjuvant therapy and coexisting illness and how such interactions affect quality of life, activities of daily living, and survival. Moreover, education of physicians and the public concerning issues related to cancer in older patients is necessary to overcome age bias in treatment selection.
|
NOTES |
|---|
H. M. Muss is a consultant for AstraZeneca; has received research funding from Aventis, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Ortho-Biotech, Novartis, and the Genetics Institute; has received fellowship support from Amgen; and has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and the Network for Oncology Communications.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopNotesAbstractIntroductionRace and Socioeconomic Status...Age as a Factor...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
1 Yancik R, Ries LA. Cancer in older persons. Magnitude of the problem—how do we apply what we know? Cancer 1994;74(7 Suppl):1995–2003.
2 Fleming ST, Rastogi A, Dmitrienko A, Johnson KD. A comprehensive prognostic index to predict survival based on multiple comorbidities: a focus on breast cancer. Med Care 1999;37:601–14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3 Swanson GM, Lin CS. Survival patterns among younger women with breast cancer: the effects of age, race, stage, and treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994;16:69–77.
4 Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Yothers G, Gray RJ, Green S, Bryant J, et al. Adjuvant therapy for very young women with breast cancer: need for tailored treatments. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001;30:44–51.
5
Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, Austin DF, Wesley MN, Muss HB, et al. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA 1994;272:947–54.
6 Franzini L, Williams AF, Franklin J, Singletary SE, Theriault RL. Effects of race and socioeconomic status on survival of 1,332 black, Hispanic, and Caucasian women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4:111–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
7
Elledge RM, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Osborne CK. Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among Caucasian, Hispanic, and black women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:705–12.
8
Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr, Albain KS. Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 1999;341:2061–7.
9 Dignam JJ. Differences in breast cancer prognosis among African-American and Caucasian women. CA Cancer J Clin 2000;50:50–64.[Abstract]
10 Roach M 3rd, Alexander M. The prognostic significance of race and survival from breast cancer: a model for assessing the reliability of reported survival differences. J Natl Med Assoc 1995;87:214–9.[Medline]
11 McWhorter WP, Schatzkin AG, Horm JW, Brown CC. Contribution of socioeconomic status to black/white differences in cancer incidence. Cancer 1989;63:982–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
12
Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1993;329:326–31.
13 Yancik R, Ries LG, Yates JW. Breast cancer in aging women. A population-based study of contrasts in stage, surgery, and survival. Cancer 1989;63:976–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14 Yancik R, Ries LA. Aging and cancer in America. Demographic and epidemiologic perspectives. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2000;14:17–23.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
15
Diab SG, Elledge RM, Clark GM. Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of elderly women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:550–6.
16
Ballard-Barbash R, Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Nayfield SG, Kessler LG. Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:716–26.
17 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;351:1451–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;352:930–942.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19
Extermann M, Balducci L, Lyman GH. What threshold for adjuvant therapy in older breast cancer patients? J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1709–17.
20
Christman K, Muss HB, Case LD, Stanley V. Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer in the elderly. The Piedmont Oncology Association experience. JAMA 1992;268:57–62.
21
Ibrahim NK, Frye DK, Buzdar AU, Walters RS, Hortobagyi GN. Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. Tolerance and outcome. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:882–8.
22
Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, Senn HJ. Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1601–8.
23
Satariano WA, Ragland DR. The effect of comorbidity on 3-year survival of women with primary breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:104–10.
24 Desch CE, Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Retchin SM. Should the elderly receive chemotherapy for node-negative breast cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis examining total and active life-expectancy outcomes. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:777–82.[Abstract]
25
Welch HG, Albertsen PC, Nease RF, Bubolz TA, Wasson JH. Estimating treatment benefits for the elderly: the effect of competing risks. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:577–84.
26 Trimble EL, Carter CL, Cain D, Freidlin B, Ungerleider RS, Friedman MA. Representation of older patients in cancer treatment trials. Cancer 1994;74:2208–14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
27 Kemeny M, Muss HB, Kornblith AB, Peterson B, Wheeler J, Cohen HJ. Barriers to participation of older women with breast cancer in clinical trials [abstract]. Proc ASCO 2000;19:602a.
28 Muss HB, Cohen HJ, Lichtman SM. Clinical research in the older cancer patient. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2000;14:283–91.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||