© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
Chapter 11: A Stochastic Model for Predicting the Mortality of Breast Cancer
Affiliation of authors: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Correspondence to: Marvin Zelen, PhD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: zelen{at}hsph.harvard.edu).
Consider a cohort of women, identified by year of birth, some of whom will eventually be diagnosed with breast cancer. A stochastic model is developed for predicting the U.S. breast cancer mortality that depends on advances in therapy and dissemination of mammographic screening. The predicted mortality can be compared with the same cohort having usual care with no screening program and absence of modern therapy, or a cohort in which only a proportion participate in a screening program and have modern therapy. The model envisions that a woman may be in four health states: i.e., 1) no disease or breast cancer that cannot be diagnosed (S0), 2) preclinical state (Sp), 3) clinical state (Sc), and 4) disease-specific death (Sd). The preclinical disease refers to breast cancer that is asymptomatic but that may be diagnosed with a special exam. The clinical state refers to symptomatic disease diagnosed under usual care. One of the basic assumptions of the model is that the disease is progressive; i.e., the transitions for the first three states are S0
SpSc. The other basic assumption is that any reduction in mortality associated with earlier diagnosis is due to a stage shift in diagnosis; i.e., early diagnosis results in a larger proportion of earlier stage patients. The model is used to predict changes in female breast cancer mortality in the U.S. women for 1975–2000. The model is general and may predict mortality for other chronic diseases that satisfy the two basic assumptions.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. S. Mandelblatt and R. Silliman Hanging in the Balance: Making Decisions About the Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening Among the Oldest Old Without a Safety Net of Scientific Evidence J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2009; 27(4): 487 - 490. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. Feuer Chapter 1: Modeling the Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Screening Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality Between 1975 and 2000: Introduction to the Problem J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. D. Clarke, S. K. Plevritis, R. Boer, K. A. Cronin, and E. J. Feuer Chapter 13: A Comparative Review of CISNET Breast Models Used To Analyze U.S. Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Trends J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 96 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. F. Habbema, S. Y. G. L. Tan, and K. A. Cronin Chapter 14: Impact of Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality, 1975-2000: Are Intermediate Outcome Measures Informative? J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Cronin, E. J. Feuer, L. D. Clarke, and S. K. Plevritis Chapter 15: Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Mammography on U.S. Mortality From 1975 to 2000: Comparison of Mortality Results From the CISNET Breast Cancer Base Case Analysis J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 112 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|