Skip Navigation

JNCI Monographs 2004 2004(32):98-102; doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh009
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paice, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paice, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

2004 © Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Assessment of Symptom Clusters in People With Cancer

Judith A. Paice

Correspondence to: Judith A. Paice, PhD, RN, FAAN, Northwestern University, Division of Hem-Onc, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Ste. 850, Chicago, IL 60611 (e-mail: j-paice{at}northwestern.edu)

The control, and ideally prevention, of symptoms such as pain, depression, and fatigue is dependent on a comprehensive clinical assessment. Furthermore, to advance the science of this field, symptom research requires the use of multidimensional instruments with proven validity and reliability in a cancer population across the lifespan. Studies demonstrate a significant correlation among pain, depression, fatigue, and other symptoms commonly seen throughout the course of cancer. Therefore, multidimensional scales incorporating the most common symptoms would ensure systematic assessment. Optimally, valid and reliable tools that measure symptom clusters would be feasible for use in both clinical and research settings. Currently available instruments that measure symptom clusters include the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, the Symptom Distress Scale, and others. Special populations include cancer patients with advanced disease, where symptom prevalence is expected to increase. Newer tools that attempt to address these populations are the Brief Hospice Inventory and the Hospice Quality of Life Index, appropriate for cancer patients with more advanced disease. Each of these tools has demonstrated utility in measuring symptom severity and quality of life. Few scales have been validated in the measurement of symptom clusters in children, in cognitively impaired adults, or in non-English speaking patients from various cultural backgrounds. The strengths and limitations presented in the clinical and research uses of each these instruments will be presented, as will be areas for future investigation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
C. Miaskowski, B. E. Aouizerat, M. Dodd, and B. Cooper
Conceptual Issues in Symptom Clusters Research and Their Implications for Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients With Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2007; 2007(37): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The OncologistHome page
J. A. Roscoe, M. E. Kaufman, S. E. Matteson-Rusby, O. G. Palesh, J. L. Ryan, S. Kohli, M. L. Perlis, and G. R. Morrow
Cancer-Related Fatigue and Sleep Disorders
Oncologist, May 1, 2007; 12(suppl_1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The OncologistHome page
K. M. Mustian, G. R. Morrow, J. K. Carroll, C. D. Figueroa-Moseley, P. Jean-Pierre, and G. C. Williams
Integrative Nonpharmacologic Behavioral Interventions for the Management of Cancer-Related Fatigue
Oncologist, May 1, 2007; 12(suppl_1): 52 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.