Skip Navigation

JNCI Monographs 1999 1999(26):17-23;
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, No. 26, 17-23, 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


II. GENE CHARACTERIZATION PANEL

Design of Gene Characterization Studies: an Overview

Duncan C. Thomas

Correspondence to: Duncan C. Thomas, Ph.D., Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar St., CHP-220, Los Angeles, CA 90033-9987 (e-mail: dthomas{at}rcf.usc.edu).

This collection of papers from the Gene Characterization Panel addresses design issues in studies aimed at assessing the population characteristics of cloned genes, such as their allele frequencies, penetrance, variation in these parameters across subpopulations, and gene-environment and gene-gene interactions. This paper provides an overview of the various designs that have been suggested, including cohort and case-control designs using independent and related individuals as well as optimal multistage sampling and hybrid designs. Various statistical (bias and efficiency) and practical considerations are suggested for evaluation of the alternative designs, with the aim of posing the question, "What is the optimal design for a particular situation"? The answer to this question clearly depends on such contextual issues as nature of the outcome variable, the gene frequency and genetic relative risk, and the importance of gene-environment and gene-gene interactions. Further methodologic work might be usefully directed toward assessment of the seriousness of the population stratification problem in general as well as methods of dealing with it, the utility of registries of high-risk families, and the merits of various hybrid designs for gene discovery and gene characterization.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.